Deadlock set to end, Government clears Supreme Court Collegium’s move to elevate Justice KM Joseph

Justice K M Joseph’s name was recommended by the Supreme Court Collegium on January 10 this year along with the name of senior counsel Indu Malhotra.

Putting an end to the protracted deadlock with the judiciary, the Government has agreed to the Supreme Court Collegium’s decision reiterating its recommendation to elevate Uttarakhand High Court Chief Justice K M Joseph to the Supreme Court along with the elevation of Madras High Court Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Orissa High Court Chief Justice Vineet Saran to the Supreme Court.

The process towards the issuance of presidential warrants for their appointment to the Supreme Court has been set in motion, sources confirmed.

This move assumes significance in the wake of the public standoff between the Government and judiciary over the issue of appointments in the higher judiciary. Justice K M Joseph’s name was recommended by the Supreme Court Collegium on January 10 this year along with the name of senior counsel Indu Malhotra.
However, the government while agreeing to the elevation of Malhotra to the Supreme Court, returned the Justice Joseph recommendation on April 26. In a letter to Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra in April, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad cited Justice Joseph’s standing in the all-India seniority list of High Court judges, adequate representation for the Kerala High Court — which is his parent High Court – in the apex court, and lack of representation of some other High Courts to request for reconsideration of the recommendation of Justice K M Joseph’s elevation.
“The collegium, in a way, acknowledged the points flagged by Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad,” said the source. “In fact, by naming Justice Vineet Saran (parent High Court Allahabad) and Justice Indira Banerjee (parent HC Calcutta), the Collegium sought to address the seniority and regional representation concerns.”

It has been learnt that the Government has also decided to go ahead with the Collegium’s recommendation for appointment of Chief Justices of several other High Courts across the country.

The delay in processing the appointment of Justice K M Joseph to the Supreme Court had set off a protracted stand-off between the judiciary and the government. Four most senior judges of the Supreme Court — Justice (now retired) J Chelameswar, Justices Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph — had addressed a press conference on January 12 warning against the dangers of alleged executive interference in the judiciary and raising questions over the functioning of CJI Misra.

Their press conference also suggested a divided judiciary in the face of a full-majority government at the Centre.

Subsequently, the delay in clearing the names of Malhotra and Justice K M Joseph simmered with Justice J Chelameswar writing on March 21 to all judges of the Supreme Court, asking CJI Dipak Misra to call a full court to discuss the issue of alleged government interference in the appointment of judges.

On April 9, Justice Kurian Joseph, another member of the Collegium, wrote a strongly worded letter to CJI Misra and all judges asking him to set up a bench of seven most senior judges to hear the matter of government’s silence over the recommendations of the collegium for appointment of Justice Joseph and Indu Malhotra.

“Failure to discharge their duty by sitting over on the recommendations of the Collegium doing nothing, in administrative law, is abuse of power. More than anything else, it sends a wrong message which is loud and clear to all Judges down the line not to cause any displeasure to the Executive lest they should suffer. Is this not a threat to the independence of the judiciary?”, Justice Joseph wrote then.

Subsequently, two other members of the Collegium, Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Madan Lokur also wrote to the CJI demanding that he call a “full court” to discuss “institutional issues” and the “future” of the court.

The first meeting of the Collegium after the reconsideration request of Justice Joseph’s name on May 2 had “deferred” the matter. Nine days later, the Collegium decided to reiterate its recommendation but also agreed to consider few more names for elevation to the Supreme Court.

The Collegium which met again on May 16 decided to hold “further deliberation and broad-based consideration of the names of the Chief Justices as well as Judges of the High Courts which are at present not represented in the Supreme Court” before re-sending Justice K M Joseph’s name to the government.

However, the Collegium could not meet until July 16 — by then Justice J Chelameswar had retired — when it decided to reiterate Justice K M Joseph’s name. Moreover, it decided to recommend Justice Banerjee and Justice Saran for elevation to the Supreme Court.

Alongside their elevation to the Supreme Court, the Government is all set to agree to Supreme Court Collegium’s May 16 decision to recommend Delhi High Court Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal as Chief Justice of Jammu & Kashmir High Court; acting Chief Justice of Kerala High Court Hrishikesh Roy as Chief Justice of the same High Court; Rajasthan High Court judge Justice K S Jhaveri as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court and Gujarat High Court judge Justice M R Shah as Chief Justice of Patna High Court.

Current Chief Justice of Patna High Court Justice Rajendra Menon will move to Delhi High Court while Calcutta High Court judge Justice Aniruddha Bose will take over as Chief Justice of Jharkhand High Court.

The Ancient Times

Because we’re journalists, we’re impatient. We want to gather the news as quickly as possible, using any technological resource available. And when we’re as sure of the story as we can be, we want to share it immediately, in whatever way reaches the most people. The Internet didn’t plant these ideas in our heads. We’ve always been this way.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: